<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 340 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202867</link>
    <description>Purification and filtration carried out to make hydrochloric acid and sulphuric acid marketable can amount to manufacture for excise purposes where the process is incidental or ancillary to completion of the product. A process need not create a chemically different commodity if, in commercial parlance, it produces an identifiable product fit for sale; on that basis, Modvat credit on inputs could not be denied and the assessee&#039;s entitlement was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 340 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202867</link>
      <description>Purification and filtration carried out to make hydrochloric acid and sulphuric acid marketable can amount to manufacture for excise purposes where the process is incidental or ancillary to completion of the product. A process need not create a chemically different commodity if, in commercial parlance, it produces an identifiable product fit for sale; on that basis, Modvat credit on inputs could not be denied and the assessee&#039;s entitlement was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>