<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 438 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202866</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the demand for deemed cenvat credit on grey fabrics not supplied by merchant manufacturers, emphasizing the prohibition against double levy of excise duty on the same goods. Additionally, the imposition of a penalty for availing cenvat credit without receiving goods was rejected due to insufficient evidence, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 438 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202866</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the demand for deemed cenvat credit on grey fabrics not supplied by merchant manufacturers, emphasizing the prohibition against double levy of excise duty on the same goods. Additionally, the imposition of a penalty for availing cenvat credit without receiving goods was rejected due to insufficient evidence, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>