<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 564 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202857</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the orders of the CIT(A) in all five cases, dismissing the appeals filed by the assessee-firms. The Tribunal concluded that the evidence found during the search justified the treatment of the amounts as &#039;undisclosed income&#039; under the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 564 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202857</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the orders of the CIT(A) in all five cases, dismissing the appeals filed by the assessee-firms. The Tribunal concluded that the evidence found during the search justified the treatment of the amounts as &#039;undisclosed income&#039; under the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>