<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 108 - ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, rejecting reliance on CBDT Circular No.12 due to the amended proviso. The provision for bad and doubtful debts issue under Section 115JB was remanded for re-examination in light of the amended law. The appeal of the revenue was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 108 - ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, rejecting reliance on CBDT Circular No.12 due to the amended proviso. The provision for bad and doubtful debts issue under Section 115JB was remanded for re-examination in light of the amended law. The appeal of the revenue was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>