https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202817 The court clarified the provisional release of goods and assessment order, directing compliance with specified bond and bank guarantee percentages. The Assistant Commissioner's demand for a 100% bank guarantee was deemed excessive, emphasizing the need to adhere to the court's directives. To safeguard Revenue's interest, the court allowed the buyer to provide a bond for any differential duty. Additionally, goods at branch offices were ordered to be cleared within three weeks for proper handling by the Excise Department. The court made the rule absolute, with specified directions and permitted direct service to relevant Respondents. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202817 The court clarified the provisional release of goods and assessment order, directing compliance with specified bond and bank guarantee percentages. The Assistant Commissioner's demand for a 100% bank guarantee was deemed excessive, emphasizing the need to adhere to the court's directives. To safeguard Revenue's interest, the court allowed the buyer to provide a bond for any differential duty. Additionally, goods at branch offices were ordered to be cleared within three weeks for proper handling by the Excise Department. The court made the rule absolute, with specified directions and permitted direct service to relevant Respondents. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202817