<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 400 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, ship breakers, in a dispute over the interest rate applicable to their refund of pre-deposits for imported ships. Despite arguments by the Departmental Representative for a 6% rate under Section 27A, the Tribunal held that the deposits should be treated as pre-deposits, entitling the appellants to a higher 12% interest rate. The decision was based on previous legal precedents and principles, ensuring consistency in interest rate application for refunds related to pre-deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 400 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, ship breakers, in a dispute over the interest rate applicable to their refund of pre-deposits for imported ships. Despite arguments by the Departmental Representative for a 6% rate under Section 27A, the Tribunal held that the deposits should be treated as pre-deposits, entitling the appellants to a higher 12% interest rate. The decision was based on previous legal precedents and principles, ensuring consistency in interest rate application for refunds related to pre-deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>