<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 182 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202756</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed a penalty under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 at Rs. 2,000 for each default, totaling Rs. 2,000 against the appellants for delayed duty payment. The penalty under Rule 25 was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of fraudulent intent, resulting in the reduction of the penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 182 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202756</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed a penalty under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 at Rs. 2,000 for each default, totaling Rs. 2,000 against the appellants for delayed duty payment. The penalty under Rule 25 was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of fraudulent intent, resulting in the reduction of the penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>