<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 19 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202755</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition seeking the quashing of the complaint case under sections 138/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found that the cheque was not issued for a legally enforceable liability, as the liability towards excise duty was not finalized even after the cheque issuance. Therefore, the prosecution of the petitioner was deemed unsustainable, leading to the quashing of the complaint.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 19 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202755</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition seeking the quashing of the complaint case under sections 138/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found that the cheque was not issued for a legally enforceable liability, as the liability towards excise duty was not finalized even after the cheque issuance. Therefore, the prosecution of the petitioner was deemed unsustainable, leading to the quashing of the complaint.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>