<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 98 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202751</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the treatment of jewellery, deletion of addition on commission earned, and the direction to the Assessing Officer for a consolidated order. The judgment emphasized the factual nature of the findings and the absence of substantial legal questions in the issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 98 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202751</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the treatment of jewellery, deletion of addition on commission earned, and the direction to the Assessing Officer for a consolidated order. The judgment emphasized the factual nature of the findings and the absence of substantial legal questions in the issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>