<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 97 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the valuation based on the written down value (WDV) as per the Income Tax Act should be adopted, rejecting the valuation report of the Registered Valuer and Chartered Engineer. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer (AO) to determine the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) using the WDV method, with the assessee being given an opportunity to be heard. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 97 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the valuation based on the written down value (WDV) as per the Income Tax Act should be adopted, rejecting the valuation report of the Registered Valuer and Chartered Engineer. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer (AO) to determine the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) using the WDV method, with the assessee being given an opportunity to be heard. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>