<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 398 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202743</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found a prima facie case in favor of the appellants, granting a stay on the amount demanded under the impugned order until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The decision emphasized the significance of auditors&#039; certificates as evidence for cenvat credit eligibility and raised concerns about taxing advance commissions for services yet to be provided. The Tribunal&#039;s analysis highlighted discrepancies in decision-making processes in tax matters, stressing the importance of clarity and consistency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 398 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202743</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found a prima facie case in favor of the appellants, granting a stay on the amount demanded under the impugned order until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The decision emphasized the significance of auditors&#039; certificates as evidence for cenvat credit eligibility and raised concerns about taxing advance commissions for services yet to be provided. The Tribunal&#039;s analysis highlighted discrepancies in decision-making processes in tax matters, stressing the importance of clarity and consistency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>