<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 712 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, finding that the appellant promptly paid the due amount upon notification and lacked awareness of their tax liability. Emphasizing the relevance of the Board&#039;s Circular and section 80 of the Finance Act, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner for a fresh decision on penalty imposition, allowing the appellant an opportunity to be heard and prove reasonable cause for non-compliance. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aimed to ensure a fair process and consideration of the appellant&#039;s circumstances before any penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 712 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, finding that the appellant promptly paid the due amount upon notification and lacked awareness of their tax liability. Emphasizing the relevance of the Board&#039;s Circular and section 80 of the Finance Act, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner for a fresh decision on penalty imposition, allowing the appellant an opportunity to be heard and prove reasonable cause for non-compliance. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aimed to ensure a fair process and consideration of the appellant&#039;s circumstances before any penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>