<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 325 - Gauhati High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202709</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s directions on the set-off of excess income in a block assessment year. It was held that undisclosed income determined by the Assessing Officer cannot be less than voluntarily declared, thus precluding set-off when the determined undisclosed income exceeds the declared amount. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s findings on set-off erroneous and ruled in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 325 - Gauhati High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202709</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s directions on the set-off of excess income in a block assessment year. It was held that undisclosed income determined by the Assessing Officer cannot be less than voluntarily declared, thus precluding set-off when the determined undisclosed income exceeds the declared amount. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s findings on set-off erroneous and ruled in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>