<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 753 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202706</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the CIT(A) deleting the addition of undisclosed income for unaccounted investment in house construction. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanation reasonable, as the sources of investment were clarified. The CIT(A) decision to delete the addition was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 753 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202706</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the CIT(A) deleting the addition of undisclosed income for unaccounted investment in house construction. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanation reasonable, as the sources of investment were clarified. The CIT(A) decision to delete the addition was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>