<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 472 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202705</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the various additions and disallowances made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) due to lack of proper justification and evidence. The disallowances and additions, including ad hoc disallowance of job work charges, addition in the capital account, unexplained investment in stamp duty, and disallowance of various expenses, were deemed unwarranted and unjustified, leading to their deletion by the tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 472 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202705</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the various additions and disallowances made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) due to lack of proper justification and evidence. The disallowances and additions, including ad hoc disallowance of job work charges, addition in the capital account, unexplained investment in stamp duty, and disallowance of various expenses, were deemed unwarranted and unjustified, leading to their deletion by the tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>