<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 752 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202701</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, allowing the taxpayer to avail Cenvat credit on Cargo Handling Service and Technical Testing &amp;amp; Analysis service provided outside the factory premises. The broader interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; encompassed services essential for manufacturing final products, even post-clearance of goods from the factory. The Tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s argument that freight expenses should be included in assessable value, as new contentions cannot be raised at the appeal stage. The taxpayer&#039;s appeal was affirmed, and the demand for wrongly availed credit, penalty, and interest were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 752 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202701</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, allowing the taxpayer to avail Cenvat credit on Cargo Handling Service and Technical Testing &amp;amp; Analysis service provided outside the factory premises. The broader interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; encompassed services essential for manufacturing final products, even post-clearance of goods from the factory. The Tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s argument that freight expenses should be included in assessable value, as new contentions cannot be raised at the appeal stage. The taxpayer&#039;s appeal was affirmed, and the demand for wrongly availed credit, penalty, and interest were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>