<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 427 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of service tax liability but waived penalties under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, for the appellant. The Tribunal granted the appellant the benefit under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, as there were no allegations of suppression, collusion, willful misstatement, or fraud. The appeal was disposed of based on these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 427 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of service tax liability but waived penalties under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, for the appellant. The Tribunal granted the appellant the benefit under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, as there were no allegations of suppression, collusion, willful misstatement, or fraud. The appeal was disposed of based on these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>