<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 615 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals by the assessee, quashing the assessment order and the penalty under Section 158BFA. Emphasizing the necessity of recording satisfaction under Section 158BD in the case of the searched person, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of meeting the preconditions for invoking jurisdiction under Section 158BD, as per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Manish Maheshwari vs. Asstt. CIT &amp;amp; Anr.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 615 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals by the assessee, quashing the assessment order and the penalty under Section 158BFA. Emphasizing the necessity of recording satisfaction under Section 158BD in the case of the searched person, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of meeting the preconditions for invoking jurisdiction under Section 158BD, as per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Manish Maheshwari vs. Asstt. CIT &amp;amp; Anr.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>