https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202667 The judgment concluded that the appellant's request for his father-in-law's Income-tax returns did not meet the threshold of larger public interest required under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. However, considering the principle of public interest, the CPIO was directed to furnish the information regarding the net taxable income of the appellant's father-in-law from 2000 to the date of the RTI application to ensure the administration of justice was not hindered by withholding relevant information. en-us Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202667 The judgment concluded that the appellant's request for his father-in-law's Income-tax returns did not meet the threshold of larger public interest required under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. However, considering the principle of public interest, the CPIO was directed to furnish the information regarding the net taxable income of the appellant's father-in-law from 2000 to the date of the RTI application to ensure the administration of justice was not hindered by withholding relevant information. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202667