https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202649 The Court rejected the Revenue's request for additional time to rectify an order by the Settlement Commission and directed the Revenue to deposit the refund amount with interest within three weeks. The Court criticized the Revenue's delay tactics and emphasized the petitioner's right to timely refund without interest. The decision aimed to prevent prejudice to the petitioner and ensure justice by addressing the delay in payment. The Court's directive underscored the importance of timely compliance with legal obligations and protecting the petitioner's rights in seeking the rightful refund amount as ordered by the Settlement Commission. en-us Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202649 The Court rejected the Revenue's request for additional time to rectify an order by the Settlement Commission and directed the Revenue to deposit the refund amount with interest within three weeks. The Court criticized the Revenue's delay tactics and emphasized the petitioner's right to timely refund without interest. The decision aimed to prevent prejudice to the petitioner and ensure justice by addressing the delay in payment. The Court's directive underscored the importance of timely compliance with legal obligations and protecting the petitioner's rights in seeking the rightful refund amount as ordered by the Settlement Commission. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202649