<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 429 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202637</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai partially allowed the appeal challenging penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalties under sections 76 and 78 were set aside due to the assessees&#039; genuine belief that certain payments were not subject to service tax. However, the penalty under section 77 was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 429 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202637</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai partially allowed the appeal challenging penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalties under sections 76 and 78 were set aside due to the assessees&#039; genuine belief that certain payments were not subject to service tax. However, the penalty under section 77 was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>