https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202610 The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of the appeal, emphasizing that the advocate's engagement in another court did not justify non-appearance. The appellant's reasons for non-appearance, including uncertainty of hearing time and rush to the High Court, were deemed insufficient. The Tribunal clarified that delaying kept back matters was not a standard practice and that requests for out-of-turn hearings were common. As the application lacked specific details and failed to establish unavoidable circumstances, it was dismissed for lack of a valid justification for non-appearance. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202610 The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of the appeal, emphasizing that the advocate's engagement in another court did not justify non-appearance. The appellant's reasons for non-appearance, including uncertainty of hearing time and rush to the High Court, were deemed insufficient. The Tribunal clarified that delaying kept back matters was not a standard practice and that requests for out-of-turn hearings were common. As the application lacked specific details and failed to establish unavoidable circumstances, it was dismissed for lack of a valid justification for non-appearance. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202610