<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 381 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202598</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming that excise duty should not be included in the total turnover for claiming a deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision aligns with the legislative intent to incentivize exports by ensuring that only profits related to export activities are eligible for deduction. The judgment provides a detailed analysis of relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents supporting this interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 381 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202598</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming that excise duty should not be included in the total turnover for claiming a deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision aligns with the legislative intent to incentivize exports by ensuring that only profits related to export activities are eligible for deduction. The judgment provides a detailed analysis of relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents supporting this interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>