<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 475 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal disposed of two appeals together, addressing whether COD clearance was required for a bank classified as a public sector entity and if excess service tax paid could be adjusted against subsequent periods. Emphasizing fairness and justice, the Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to re-examine the adjustment issue and consider permissibility, ensuring procedural laws do not hinder substantive rights. Both appeals were remanded for further examination and disposal within the legal framework to resolve the disputes effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 475 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal disposed of two appeals together, addressing whether COD clearance was required for a bank classified as a public sector entity and if excess service tax paid could be adjusted against subsequent periods. Emphasizing fairness and justice, the Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to re-examine the adjustment issue and consider permissibility, ensuring procedural laws do not hinder substantive rights. Both appeals were remanded for further examination and disposal within the legal framework to resolve the disputes effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>