<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 672 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202587</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that Aventis CropScience (India) Ltd. is a related person of BIL, establishing the assessable value based on the price charged by Aventis CropScience (India) Ltd. to the end user. The extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of intent to evade duty, limiting the demand to the normal period. The penalty under Section 11AC was set aside as there was no evidence of intent to evade duty. The case was remanded to the Commissioner for recalculating the demand within the limitation period, allowing the appellants an opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 672 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202587</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that Aventis CropScience (India) Ltd. is a related person of BIL, establishing the assessable value based on the price charged by Aventis CropScience (India) Ltd. to the end user. The extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of intent to evade duty, limiting the demand to the normal period. The penalty under Section 11AC was set aside as there was no evidence of intent to evade duty. The case was remanded to the Commissioner for recalculating the demand within the limitation period, allowing the appellants an opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>