<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 312 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202586</link>
    <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly on its own terms, and the definition from another notification cannot be imported to enlarge its scope. The appellant failed to establish that its factory satisfied the notification&#039;s composite mill conditions, and the plea was also unsupported by the record because it had not been raised before the lower authorities. The concessional duty benefit under Notification No. 14/2002-C.E. was therefore unavailable. Wrongful availment of the exemption without disclosure of the relevant facts justified penalty, which was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 312 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202586</link>
      <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly on its own terms, and the definition from another notification cannot be imported to enlarge its scope. The appellant failed to establish that its factory satisfied the notification&#039;s composite mill conditions, and the plea was also unsupported by the record because it had not been raised before the lower authorities. The concessional duty benefit under Notification No. 14/2002-C.E. was therefore unavailable. Wrongful availment of the exemption without disclosure of the relevant facts justified penalty, which was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>