<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 472 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202581</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in favor of the petitioners, directing the respondents to refund the countervailing duty paid under protest for importing plastic. The court held that the duty payment was a pre-deposit and not subject to the limitation period for refund. The respondents were ordered to pay interest from a specified date until the actual refund, release provisional duty bonds, and bear no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 472 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202581</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in favor of the petitioners, directing the respondents to refund the countervailing duty paid under protest for importing plastic. The court held that the duty payment was a pre-deposit and not subject to the limitation period for refund. The respondents were ordered to pay interest from a specified date until the actual refund, release provisional duty bonds, and bear no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>