<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 470 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202578</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee was partially allowed. The addition of cash found in the common bedroom of major daughters and the expenditure on the Grah Parvesh ceremony were deemed unjustified and deleted due to lack of contradictory evidence. The addition on account of low household withdrawals was also deleted as it was considered speculative. The court directed the Assessing Officer to recalculate interest under s. 158BFA(1) of the Act after implementing the appeal order&#039;s effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 470 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202578</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee was partially allowed. The addition of cash found in the common bedroom of major daughters and the expenditure on the Grah Parvesh ceremony were deemed unjustified and deleted due to lack of contradictory evidence. The addition on account of low household withdrawals was also deleted as it was considered speculative. The court directed the Assessing Officer to recalculate interest under s. 158BFA(1) of the Act after implementing the appeal order&#039;s effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>