<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 68 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202545</link>
    <description>Adjustment for notional interest on outstanding receivables from associated enterprises was held unsustainable because a continuing debit balance, by itself, is not an &quot;international transaction&quot; under s.92B unless it is shown to have a bearing on the assessee&#039;s profits, income, losses, or assets; no such impact was demonstrated. Further, delayed realization must be examined in light of the agreed commercial payment terms, not in isolation. Even if treated as an international transaction, the TPO&#039;s CUP analysis was legally flawed: LIBOR applies to lending/borrowing, not trade overdues, and comparables must be receivables (debtors), not loans. Absent internal/external CUP evidence of interest on similar overdues, the ALP adjustment was deleted and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 14:56:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 68 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202545</link>
      <description>Adjustment for notional interest on outstanding receivables from associated enterprises was held unsustainable because a continuing debit balance, by itself, is not an &quot;international transaction&quot; under s.92B unless it is shown to have a bearing on the assessee&#039;s profits, income, losses, or assets; no such impact was demonstrated. Further, delayed realization must be examined in light of the agreed commercial payment terms, not in isolation. Even if treated as an international transaction, the TPO&#039;s CUP analysis was legally flawed: LIBOR applies to lending/borrowing, not trade overdues, and comparables must be receivables (debtors), not loans. Absent internal/external CUP evidence of interest on similar overdues, the ALP adjustment was deleted and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>