<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 120 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, rejecting the appeals as unsustainable due to the lack of evidence supporting the price reduction claim. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving discrepancies in vessel contents to justify any reduction in value or refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 120 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, rejecting the appeals as unsustainable due to the lack of evidence supporting the price reduction claim. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving discrepancies in vessel contents to justify any reduction in value or refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>