<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 419 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202515</link>
    <description>A duty demand cannot be sustained where the appellate authority has already found the show cause notice time-barred and that finding remains unchallenged. The note states that, once limitation defeats the demand, the merits of the levy do not revive the liability; the assessee&#039;s bona fide reliance on the then prevailing Tribunal view supported the time-bar finding. On that basis, the associated interest and penalty consequences also could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 419 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202515</link>
      <description>A duty demand cannot be sustained where the appellate authority has already found the show cause notice time-barred and that finding remains unchallenged. The note states that, once limitation defeats the demand, the merits of the levy do not revive the liability; the assessee&#039;s bona fide reliance on the then prevailing Tribunal view supported the time-bar finding. On that basis, the associated interest and penalty consequences also could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>