https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202501 The withdrawal of a taxpayer's monthly central excise duty payment facility was set aside because the first order was passed without hearing and the later order failed to deal with the objections raised. The court held that a quasi-judicial authority must observe natural justice and give a reasoned order that considers the party's contentions; otherwise, the decision is unsustainable and causes miscarriage of justice. The matter was remitted for fresh decision on merits by a competent officer other than the officer who made the earlier order. en-us Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202501 The withdrawal of a taxpayer's monthly central excise duty payment facility was set aside because the first order was passed without hearing and the later order failed to deal with the objections raised. The court held that a quasi-judicial authority must observe natural justice and give a reasoned order that considers the party's contentions; otherwise, the decision is unsustainable and causes miscarriage of justice. The matter was remitted for fresh decision on merits by a competent officer other than the officer who made the earlier order. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202501