<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 298 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202497</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the illicit import of Nepali cigarettes. The Tribunal clarified that the penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act is an upper limit, not a minimum, based on the value of the goods or duty sought to be evaded. This interpretation was supported by a previous Tribunal decision. Consequently, the Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the original penalty of Rs. 4,500, emphasizing that the prescribed penalty is a maximum limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 298 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202497</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the illicit import of Nepali cigarettes. The Tribunal clarified that the penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act is an upper limit, not a minimum, based on the value of the goods or duty sought to be evaded. This interpretation was supported by a previous Tribunal decision. Consequently, the Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the original penalty of Rs. 4,500, emphasizing that the prescribed penalty is a maximum limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>