<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 113 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, citing lack of satisfactory explanation for the delay. The applicant&#039;s argument of confusion in receiving the impugned order was deemed insufficient, as the order was received by the appellant&#039;s company. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of organizing business operations efficiently to exercise legal rights diligently. As no proper justification was provided for the delay, the Tribunal concluded that the applicant did not establish grounds for condonation and dismissed the application, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 113 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, citing lack of satisfactory explanation for the delay. The applicant&#039;s argument of confusion in receiving the impugned order was deemed insufficient, as the order was received by the appellant&#039;s company. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of organizing business operations efficiently to exercise legal rights diligently. As no proper justification was provided for the delay, the Tribunal concluded that the applicant did not establish grounds for condonation and dismissed the application, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>