<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 368 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202490</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication. The parties were to be given a fresh opportunity to present their case, considering legal precedents and decisions not available during the relevant period. The Tribunal clarified it did not assess the case&#039;s merits but focused on procedural aspects and legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 368 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202490</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication. The parties were to be given a fresh opportunity to present their case, considering legal precedents and decisions not available during the relevant period. The Tribunal clarified it did not assess the case&#039;s merits but focused on procedural aspects and legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>