<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 111 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, directing the Commissioner to consider the case on merit without insisting on the pre-deposit of service tax amount. The matter was remanded for a merit-based decision on whether the service provided constituted man power supply, given discrepancies in payment details. The ambiguity surrounding the payment of wages to expert personnel necessitated further examination, leading to a comprehensive review by the Commissioner to clarify the nature of the service and payment structure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 111 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, directing the Commissioner to consider the case on merit without insisting on the pre-deposit of service tax amount. The matter was remanded for a merit-based decision on whether the service provided constituted man power supply, given discrepancies in payment details. The ambiguity surrounding the payment of wages to expert personnel necessitated further examination, leading to a comprehensive review by the Commissioner to clarify the nature of the service and payment structure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>