<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 751 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202466</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the amount received by the assessee for relinquishing honorary positions should be classified as &quot;income from other sources&quot; and not as a capital receipt. The court emphasized the absence of a transfer of capital asset and the lack of monetary loss from relinquishing the positions. The decision overturned the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, with the appeal being allowed in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 751 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202466</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the amount received by the assessee for relinquishing honorary positions should be classified as &quot;income from other sources&quot; and not as a capital receipt. The court emphasized the absence of a transfer of capital asset and the lack of monetary loss from relinquishing the positions. The decision overturned the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, with the appeal being allowed in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>