<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 36 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority to verify the refund claim without unjust enrichment. The decision emphasized the importance of accurately assessing cenvat credit utilization and interest liability in excise duty cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 36 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority to verify the refund claim without unjust enrichment. The decision emphasized the importance of accurately assessing cenvat credit utilization and interest liability in excise duty cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>