<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 412 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202449</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a service tax exemption notification, upholding the direction for the appellant to deposit the admitted amount pending the outcome of the writ-application. The court emphasized the need to balance legal principles, revenue collection, and individual case merits, rejecting arguments based on past interim orders in similar cases and stressing the importance of considering the balance of convenience in revenue matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 412 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202449</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a service tax exemption notification, upholding the direction for the appellant to deposit the admitted amount pending the outcome of the writ-application. The court emphasized the need to balance legal principles, revenue collection, and individual case merits, rejecting arguments based on past interim orders in similar cases and stressing the importance of considering the balance of convenience in revenue matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>