<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 411 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202445</link>
    <description>Two adjudication orders arising from separate show cause notices for the same period and clearances could not both be sustained where the later notice relied on different cost figures yet resulted in a higher demand, and the basis for issuing a fresh notice was unexplained. The Tribunal found an apparent duplication of demand and held that the cryptic orders had not properly examined the issues. The matters were therefore set aside and remanded for de novo adjudication, with a reasonable opportunity of hearing and consideration of all relevant materials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 411 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202445</link>
      <description>Two adjudication orders arising from separate show cause notices for the same period and clearances could not both be sustained where the later notice relied on different cost figures yet resulted in a higher demand, and the basis for issuing a fresh notice was unexplained. The Tribunal found an apparent duplication of demand and held that the cryptic orders had not properly examined the issues. The matters were therefore set aside and remanded for de novo adjudication, with a reasonable opportunity of hearing and consideration of all relevant materials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>