<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 710 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by setting aside the confiscation of goods and penalties against the company and its Directors. The demand for interest was limited to the period from 11-5-2001 onwards. The claim for SSI exemption was denied due to the unauthorized use of another entity&#039;s brand name. The extended period for issuing the show cause notice was upheld due to suppression of facts. Penalties imposed on the Directors were also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 710 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by setting aside the confiscation of goods and penalties against the company and its Directors. The demand for interest was limited to the period from 11-5-2001 onwards. The claim for SSI exemption was denied due to the unauthorized use of another entity&#039;s brand name. The extended period for issuing the show cause notice was upheld due to suppression of facts. Penalties imposed on the Directors were also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>