<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 291 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202420</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI upheld the valuation method used by the respondents for normal grade &#039;Amorphous Chips,&#039; finding them broadly comparable to contemporaneously imported goods. The Tribunal also accepted a 10% lower valuation for sub-standard grade chips, as argued by the respondents. Consequently, the department&#039;s appeal challenging both valuations was deemed not maintainable and was rejected. The cross-objection filed by the respondents was also dismissed. The judgment provided a comprehensive resolution to the valuation issues raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 291 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202420</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI upheld the valuation method used by the respondents for normal grade &#039;Amorphous Chips,&#039; finding them broadly comparable to contemporaneously imported goods. The Tribunal also accepted a 10% lower valuation for sub-standard grade chips, as argued by the respondents. Consequently, the department&#039;s appeal challenging both valuations was deemed not maintainable and was rejected. The cross-objection filed by the respondents was also dismissed. The judgment provided a comprehensive resolution to the valuation issues raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>