https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202419 The case involved duty and penalty on an appellant company and one director for alleged clandestine removal of goods and shortage of raw materials. The appeals were made against an Order-in-Original. The appellant requested to present evidence showing duty payment on goods claimed as clandestinely removed, which was not produced earlier due to illness. The case was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority to consider the evidence provided by the appellant within three months. The decision to remand was made without expressing an opinion on the merits, keeping all issues open for further consideration. The appeals were allowed by way of remand. en-us Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202419 The case involved duty and penalty on an appellant company and one director for alleged clandestine removal of goods and shortage of raw materials. The appeals were made against an Order-in-Original. The appellant requested to present evidence showing duty payment on goods claimed as clandestinely removed, which was not produced earlier due to illness. The case was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority to consider the evidence provided by the appellant within three months. The decision to remand was made without expressing an opinion on the merits, keeping all issues open for further consideration. The appeals were allowed by way of remand. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202419