<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 492 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202414</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on undisclosed loans of Rs. 43,86,325 during the block period from April 1, 1990, to March 19, 2001. The loans were disclosed in audit reports, balance-sheets, and tax returns for specific assessment years, with detailed information. The Court found no substantial question of law to disagree with this conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 492 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202414</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on undisclosed loans of Rs. 43,86,325 during the block period from April 1, 1990, to March 19, 2001. The loans were disclosed in audit reports, balance-sheets, and tax returns for specific assessment years, with detailed information. The Court found no substantial question of law to disagree with this conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>