<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 544 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the respondents are not classified as a Commercial Training or Coaching Centre and their activities do not attract service tax liability under Convention Service. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) ruling that penalties imposed were unjustified due to the absence of sustainable service tax demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 544 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the respondents are not classified as a Commercial Training or Coaching Centre and their activities do not attract service tax liability under Convention Service. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) ruling that penalties imposed were unjustified due to the absence of sustainable service tax demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>