https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202405 The case involved duty demands and penalties imposed on factories for manufacturing disproportionate quantities of Sodium Silicate compared to Soda Ash consumed. The Tribunal remanded the cases for de novo consideration due to errors in calculation and lack of evidence. Discrepancies in solid and liquid sodium silicate quantities were noted, with allegations of clandestine purchase of raw materials and removal of final products without duty payment. The Tribunal found evidence of unaccounted raw materials and purchases without bills sufficient to establish clandestine activities, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the appeals. en-us Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202405 The case involved duty demands and penalties imposed on factories for manufacturing disproportionate quantities of Sodium Silicate compared to Soda Ash consumed. The Tribunal remanded the cases for de novo consideration due to errors in calculation and lack of evidence. Discrepancies in solid and liquid sodium silicate quantities were noted, with allegations of clandestine purchase of raw materials and removal of final products without duty payment. The Tribunal found evidence of unaccounted raw materials and purchases without bills sufficient to establish clandestine activities, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202405