<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202397</link>
    <description>HC upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision that simultaneous penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 are not warranted for the same period and default. It held that section 76 deals with failure to pay service tax, while section 78 addresses suppression of taxable value and is more comprehensive with a higher penalty. Even though the provisions are technically distinct and the express mutual exclusivity came into effect only from 10.5.2008, imposition of penalty under section 76 is unwarranted where penalty under section 78 has already been imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202397</link>
      <description>HC upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision that simultaneous penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 are not warranted for the same period and default. It held that section 76 deals with failure to pay service tax, while section 78 addresses suppression of taxable value and is more comprehensive with a higher penalty. Even though the provisions are technically distinct and the express mutual exclusivity came into effect only from 10.5.2008, imposition of penalty under section 76 is unwarranted where penalty under section 78 has already been imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>