<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202393</link>
    <description>Credit of duty on high speed diesel oil used in diesel generating sets for captive electricity generation was not admissible under the MODVAT scheme because the relevant Rule 57A notifications excluded that input from eligibility. Although Rule 57B and the amended Rule 57D referred to inputs used for electricity generation, the later explanation confined &quot;inputs&quot; to those specifically notified under Rule 57A, confirming the legislative intent to deny credit on high speed diesel oil. The Finance Act, 2000 validation provision was treated as clarificatory and retrospective, so no vested or accrued right could arise in respect of an input excluded from the scheme from the outset. The challenge to retrospective denial therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 15:46:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202393</link>
      <description>Credit of duty on high speed diesel oil used in diesel generating sets for captive electricity generation was not admissible under the MODVAT scheme because the relevant Rule 57A notifications excluded that input from eligibility. Although Rule 57B and the amended Rule 57D referred to inputs used for electricity generation, the later explanation confined &quot;inputs&quot; to those specifically notified under Rule 57A, confirming the legislative intent to deny credit on high speed diesel oil. The Finance Act, 2000 validation provision was treated as clarificatory and retrospective, so no vested or accrued right could arise in respect of an input excluded from the scheme from the outset. The challenge to retrospective denial therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>