<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 408 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202387</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate garments and imported fabric for non-compliance with exemption conditions under the Customs Act, allowing redemption upon payment of a fine. Confiscation of finished products from various premises was also upheld due to illegal removal and non-payment of duty, with the importer held liable to pay duty and a fine. Denial of exemption for misused capital goods imported under bond was justified, leading to duty payment and penalties. Enforcement of the bond and penalties imposed on the company and Managing Director were deemed appropriate by the Tribunal, affirming the decisions on confiscation, duty payment, and penalties under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 408 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202387</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate garments and imported fabric for non-compliance with exemption conditions under the Customs Act, allowing redemption upon payment of a fine. Confiscation of finished products from various premises was also upheld due to illegal removal and non-payment of duty, with the importer held liable to pay duty and a fine. Denial of exemption for misused capital goods imported under bond was justified, leading to duty payment and penalties. Enforcement of the bond and penalties imposed on the company and Managing Director were deemed appropriate by the Tribunal, affirming the decisions on confiscation, duty payment, and penalties under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>