<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 352 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202385</link>
    <description>HC upheld the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the CIT&#039;s exercise of power under s.263, finding the Assessing Officers had made adequate, detailed enquiries, collected and examined relevant material and discussed matters with the taxpayer before framing assessments. The Court held the Commissioner&#039;s criticism was subjective, factually incorrect in parts, and amounted merely to a wish for deeper probing rather than pointing out any legal error prejudicial to revenue. Consequently, the s.263 direction for fresh assessments was unwarranted and the Tribunal&#039;s reversal of the CIT&#039;s order was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 352 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202385</link>
      <description>HC upheld the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s cancellation of the CIT&#039;s exercise of power under s.263, finding the Assessing Officers had made adequate, detailed enquiries, collected and examined relevant material and discussed matters with the taxpayer before framing assessments. The Court held the Commissioner&#039;s criticism was subjective, factually incorrect in parts, and amounted merely to a wish for deeper probing rather than pointing out any legal error prejudicial to revenue. Consequently, the s.263 direction for fresh assessments was unwarranted and the Tribunal&#039;s reversal of the CIT&#039;s order was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>